本帖最后由 gaowenhua 于 2022-9-10 23:21 编辑
如果你到一个陌生的地方,会选择去人多的饭店吃饭,还是去没人的饭店呢?
很多人哪怕排队半小时、一小时,也不太会去一家看上去很冷清,没有什么人吃饭的餐厅。为什么呢?
通常我们会自动默认人多的那家一定是味道好、物有所值,哪怕我们没有吃过、对比过。也正是因此,慢慢地人多的饭店客人越来越多,老板的生意越做越大,而人少的那家,最后可能只好关门大吉。
贫者愈贫,富者愈富,赢家通吃的马太效应在现实中比比皆是:
国庆档一个爆款电影,就可能会吸走档期内几乎所有的排片;
一个投入巨大营销的商品,就可能会抢占大部分的市场;
......
有一句“残酷”的话正好可以用来解释这类现象,“凡是有的,还要给他;但凡没有的,连他所有的,也要夺走。”
弱者的资源是极其有限的,生存的最大武器就是不断整合自身资源,然后投入竞争。
If you go to an unfamiliar place, will you choose to eat at a restaurant with many people, or a restaurant with no people?Even if many people wait in line for half an hour or an hour, they are not very likely to go to a restaurant that looks deserted and has no people to eat. why?Usually we will automatically default that the one with more people must be delicious and worth the money, even if we have not tried it or compared it. It is precisely because of this that the hotel with many people gradually has more and more guests, and the boss's business is getting bigger and bigger, and the hotel with few people may have to close its doors in the end.The poor get poorer, the rich get richer, and the winner-takes-all Matthew effect abounds in reality:A blockbuster movie in the National Day file may suck up almost all the films in the schedule;A commodity that has invested heavily in marketing may seize most of the market;......There is a "cruel" phrase that can be used to explain this kind of phenomenon. "Whoever has it will be given to him; but whoever does not have it, even what he has will be taken away."The resources of the weak are extremely limited, and the biggest weapon for survival is to constantly integrate their own resources and then enter the competition.
|